November 15, 2009
In the Region | Westchester
The Use Changes; the Look Stays
By ELSA BRENNER
UNTIL two years ago, the boarded-up Ossining National Bank on Main
Street served as a nagging reminder that a once-thriving business
district was sliding downhill. The last bank tenant vacated the
building, a three-story Renaissance Revival-style structure, in
1966, and it had been vacant ever since.
Today, light shines through its tall windows again, the cracked tile
roof has been repaired and the stone and terra-cotta exterior has
been refurbished.
Thanks to a $4.6 million renovation, what was once the workplace of
tellers and loan officers is being recycled into street-floor
commercial space with 12 income-restricted condominiums above.
“The people of Ossining have been waiting forever for this building
to come back,” said William R. Hanauer, the village’s mayor. “It’s
emblematic of a turnaround.”
The bank, built in 1873, sits in a three-block area with about 35
other old retail buildings; together they make up a National
Historic District. To stimulate more activity at the site, the
village recently altered its zoning laws to allow building owners to
rent space over their shops to residential tenants.
But though historic renovations help revitalize downtowns and
instill optimism in residents and officials, they can be challenging
to undertake. Developers’ experiences on the Ossining project, as
well as one in Yonkers involving six late-19th-century
brick-and-limestone buildings, give a sense of how difficult it can
be to restore an antiquated structure for purposes of affordable
housing in
Westchester.
The developer of the Ossining bank, John Saraceno of Trinity
Associates in Elmsford, described the process as frustrating and not
highly remunerative — “one of the smaller but more difficult jobs”
that the firm had ever undertaken.
“It would have been better in certain ways to have taken the
building down and started from scratch,” said Mr. Saraceno, whose
firm in 2000 converted an abandoned 1919 high school in Peekskill
into a 120-unit independent living community.
The bank had suffered from neglect for years, under a series of
owners. It had been gutted, but renovations were never followed
through, said Joanne Tall, the chairwoman of the village’s historic
review commission.
Ms. Tall said the commission “made certain that no
character-defining features on the building were lost.” The panel
“doesn’t dictate a building’s use,” she explained. “That’s for
zoning ordinances to do.”
But the panel did have the right, for instance, to require that the
terra-cotta cornice with medallions and the Spanish tiled roof be
restored rather than replaced with something new.
For Mr. Saraceno, that meant a countrywide search for exact matches
for the roof tile, much of which was either cracked or missing.
Replacements were eventually tracked down in the Virginia warehouse
of a company that specializes in antique roof materials, he said.
In Yonkers, the Greyston Foundation, a community development group
that has reclaimed a number of old retail buildings for housing, is
now embarking upon a six-building project covering about 32,000
square feet. The foundation had planned to raze the buildings except
for the facades.
“It would have been cheaper and more efficient to start anew,” said
Steven Brown, Greyston’s president. “We didn’t think it was worth
saving, but citizens pressed to have it landmarked, and it was
designated last year, so it was back to the drawing board.”
The project, which calls for 93 income-restricted living units with
retailing on the first floor, is expected to cost $40 million.
Such conversions, which preserve historic beauty but involve
multiple sources of financing and oversight by local boards, “are
inherently very challenging because you’re trying to serve so many
masters and competing interests,” Mr. Brown said.
In Ossining, the 21,000-square-foot bank renovation, which began 18
months ago and is nearly finished, is being paid for in part with
$1.2 million from Westchester County, $480,000 from the
New York State Affordable
Housing Corporation, a traditional $2.6 million mortgage and the
firm’s own equity.
The seven one-bedroom units will sell to people earning less than 80
percent of the county’s median income. For a one-person household,
that means an income of less than $59,000 a year; for two people,
the annual income must be under $67,400, said Rose Noonan, the
executive director of the nonprofit Housing Action Council in
Tarrytown.
The five two-bedroom units are priced at $214,000 to $221,000; the
seven one-bedroom condos will sell for $179,000 to $198,000.
“We’re only talking about 12 units,” Ms. Noonan said, “but they are
an important 12, because there hasn’t been any affordable
homeownership available in the village of Ossining until now. It’s
an opportunity for singles and couples, or a single parent with a
child.”